French law recognises no autonomous « contrat de distribution ». The label is generic; what
governs the relationship is the set of rights and obligations you actually
agree and the way the distributor in fact operates — not the wording on the
cover.
The same commercial arrangement can be structured as selective distribution, exclusive distribution, agency, commission, concession or franchise, each carrying different consequences on termination, indemnity and liability. You have wide freedom to choose, bounded only by public-order rules.
Choosing the regime deliberately at the outset — rather than discovering it years later in litigation — is the single most consequential decision in building a French distributor network.
Two French law statuses are mandatory (public order) and cannot be drafted away: the VRP (salaried sales
representative) and the salaried or "libre" branch manager (gérant de
succursale).
Where a distributor sells goods supplied almost exclusively by you, from premises you approve, at prices and conditions you impose, Article L 7321-2 of the Code du travail can pull the relationship into salaried-employment protection — even absent any subordination, and even where the distributor operates through a company.
The consequence is severe: dismissal-style protection, severance, social-security affiliation and the labour courts on working conditions. Courts assess the reality case by case; drafting that concentrates control over premises, pricing and supply is what triggers the status.
Under
Articles L 134-1 et seq., a commercial agent is an independent intermediary
who, on a permanent basis, negotiates — and possibly concludes — contracts in
the name and for the account of the principal. This qualification is public
order: it depends on how the activity is exercised, not on the label the
parties adopt, and weak drafting can turn a "distributor" into a
statutory agent.
The stakes are the termination indemnity. A statutory agent is entitled, as of right and notwithstanding any clause to the contrary, to compensation for the harm caused by termination (Article L 134-12), forfeited only for the agent's gross negligence or serious breach and subject to a one-year notification deadline. Note the test: an agent who merely holds the power to negotiate qualifies even if the contract states he cannot bind the principal or alter prices.
Where you
make your trademark, trade name or sign available to the distributor and
require an exclusivity or quasi-exclusivity commitment in return, you must
deliver a sincere pre-contractual disclosure document at least twenty days
before signature (Articles L 330-3, R 330-1, R 330-2). Any further figures you
volunteer — forecasts, a local-market study — must also be sincere.
Breach carries a €1,500 fine and, more importantly, exposure to nullity where the missing information vitiated the distributor's consent, plus damages for the lost chance not to contract or to contract on better terms. The obligation is treated as a loi de police and reaches franchise, concession and location-gérance arrangements alike.
An exclusivity — the distributor being the only one entitled
to sell in a defined territory — must be expressly stipulated; French courts
assess its existence strictly.
To be valid it must be determined or determinable as to territory and limited in time, though the courts are liberal on duration.
If you grant exclusivity, you must respect it. A supplier breaches by selling directly to customers in the reserved sector, appointing another distributor there, or selling through its own website where the contract forbids it — exposing itself to damages and, where exclusivity was decisive, to termination.
You remain free to suspend performance for non-payment.
An
undertaking by the distributor to source only from you cannot exceed ten years
(Article L 330-1 of the French Commercial Code).
Beyond that term the clause is reduced to ten years or, where it is indissociable from the contract's object, the whole contract lapses; accessory obligations — loans, equipment, penalties — are reduced with it. Successive linked contracts on the same goods all end on the date fixed in the first (Article L 330-2).
Draft the purchase quantities precisely. Without them the "exclusivity" degrades into a mere priority-supply obligation, or a bare ban on sourcing elsewhere, and a distributor who ceases trading before the term cannot be reproached for failing to buy a quantity it never committed to.
In a selective network you supply only distributors chosen against defined criteria and bar them from reselling to non-approved dealers.
The criteria are lawful only if they are objective and qualitative, fixed uniformly for every potential reseller, applied without discrimination, genuinely required by the product, and no wider than necessary.
A lawful network is protected: you can claim against out-of-network resellers who take part in breaching the resale ban (Article L 442-2 of the French Commercial Code), provided you first prove that the network itself is valid and compatible with competition law. Restrictions on online sales are scrutinised closely and remain a live enforcement risk.
A concessionnaire buys the supplier's products firm (achat ferme) and resells them in its own name and for its own account, like a merchant.
Firm purchasing — proved through the supplier's invoices — is the defining criterion, whatever the degree of control, the margin, or the presence of exclusivity.
No statute governs the concession; it runs on case law and the general law of contract.
On exit the concessionaire has no automatic indemnity for the clientele it built, and the mandat d'intérêt commun has been rejected here.
A fixed-term concession ends at its term (subject to customary notice of non-renewal); an indefinite one can be terminated subject to abuse and to the abrupt-termination rules.
Stock is bought back only if the contract says so, brand use ends, and where the activity amounts to an entreprise the staff may transfer under Article L 1224-1 of the French Employment Code.
A commissionnaire sells or buys for the principal's account but contracts in its own name, so it is personally bound to the third party even when the principal is known — a structural difference from agency.
It enjoys a privilege over the goods in its possession, securing what the principal owes it (Article L 132-1). Critically, the mandat d'intérêt commun indemnity does not apply to commission.
On unilateral termination the commissionnaire is entitled only to ordinary damages for abusive termination, which it must prove — a materially lighter exit liability than the statutory agent's.
There is no autonomous legal qualification of "franchise."
A franchise is a coordinated bundle — trademark licence, transfer of know-how, and assistance — each element governed by its own rules, all sitting on the general law of contract.
Its consideration must be real: the entry fee and royalties have to be matched by a genuine mark, transferable know-how and effective assistance, failing which the contract can be annulled or terminated.
The exposures cluster around control. Over-direction can requalify the franchisee as an employee, make the franchisor a de facto manager or a de facto partner, or create abusive economic dependence (Article L 420-2 of the French Commercial Code).
Post-term non-compete and non-affiliation clauses bind only where they are indispensable to protect the transmitted know-how and are kept proportionate.
An established commercial relationship cannot be broken off without sufficient written notice, and the notice duty exists independently of the contract's wording (Article L 442-1 of the French Commercial Code).
Damages are measured on the margin lost over the notice period that should have been given — a liability that attaches even where no other fault exists.
Beyond notice, the termination can itself be abusive: evicting a distributor to capture the network it built, or acting with intent to harm or with blameworthy haste.
Where a clause makes the relationship terminable on a defined objective event, the court confines itself to checking that the event has in fact occurred.
French law polices the substance of the bargain between businesses.
Subjecting a partner to obligations that create a significant imbalance in the parties' rights (Article L 442-1, I-2°) engages liability; the imbalance is judged concretely, against the contract's overall economy, and does not follow merely because a clause is less favourable than the default rule.
Likewise, obtaining — or attempting to obtain — an advantage with no consideration, or manifestly disproportionate to the value given, is actionable (Article L 442-1, I-1°). And certain clauses are void outright, including retroactive rebates, automatic most-favoured-terms, and bans on assigning receivables (Article L 442-3 of the French Commercial Code).
Prices are set by competition (Article L 410-2). You cannot impose a resale price and cannot induce resale at a loss (Article L 442-5); a distributor or franchisee that buys firm is free to set its own resale price.
You may communicate indicative prices, or maximum prices to keep the network coherent — but not a mandatory floor.
The position differs for a commissionnaire, which does not "resell" but sells for your account: it must respect the price and conditions you fix, and selling below them without your consent exposes it to damages.
Matching the pricing lever to the chosen regime is part of designing the network.
Where a network ties independent retail operators through several linked contracts aimed at running a shop and capable of restricting the operator's commercial freedom, the law requires a common expiry: terminating one contract terminates the whole set (Article L 341-1).
Certain contracts are carved out — commercial leases, company and cooperative contracts, and pure trademark-availability arrangements.
Post-term clauses restricting the operator's freedom are deemed unwritten unless four cumulative conditions are met (Article L 341-2): the clause concerns goods competing with those under the contract, is limited to the premises used during the contract, is indispensable to protect substantial and secret transmitted know-how, and lasts no more than one year after the contract ends.