I.-It may be resorted to the installation and use of an apparatus or technical device mentioned in 1° of Article 226-3 of the Penal Code in order to collect technical connection data enabling the identification of a terminal equipment or its user’s subscription number, as well as data relating to the location of a terminal equipment used.
II.-This apparatus or device may be installed or used in order to intercept correspondence sent or received by terminal equipment. The procedures set out in articles 100-3 to 100-7 of this Code shall then apply and, where such interceptions are authorised by the liberty and custody judge at the request of the public prosecutor, the powers conferred on the investigating judge or the judicial police officer appointed by him shall be exercised by the public prosecutor or the judicial police officer requested by this magistrate. Correspondence intercepted pursuant to this II may only concern the person or the link covered by the interception authorisation. By way of derogation from Article 706-95-16, the maximum periods of authorisation for the interception of correspondence under this II shall be forty-eight hours, renewable once.
.