I. – With the exception of the cases mentioned in II and III, deeds carried out in relation to the seizure of immovable property and licitation by judicial auction (numbers 1, 2 and 3 of Table 6) give rise to the collection of the fee charged by notaries pursuant to 1° of Article A. 444-102, thus divided between the lawyers involved:
1° The pursuing lawyer shall receive three quarters;
2° The successful bidder’s lawyer shall receive the remaining quarter.
II. – In the event of a higher bid, the lawyer who pursued the first sale and the higher bidding lawyer together receive the fee provided for in 1° of I. The ratio between the emolument of one and the other must be equal to the ratio between, on the one hand, the initial auction price and, on the other hand, the difference between the auction price on the higher bid and the initial auction price.
III. – In the event of a repeat bid, the pursuing lawyer receives the full fee provided for in I.
IV. – If the proceedings are abandoned after the conditions of sale or specifications have been filed, the pursuing lawyer shall be allocated 37.5% of the fee provided for in I, on the amount of the upset price.
V. – In the event of an amicable sale with judicial authorisation, or a sale by mutual agreement under the conditions provided for in the second paragraph of article L. 322-1 of the Code of Civil Enforcement Procedures, the pursuing lawyer shall receive the fee charged by notaries pursuant to article A. 444-91.