The period provided for in the last paragraph of Article L. 521-6 and given to the claimant to take civil or criminal action on the merits, or to lodge a complaint with the public prosecutor, is twenty working days or thirty-one calendar days, whichever is longer, from the date of the order. .
The seizure, whether descriptive or real, provided for in Article L. 521-4 shall be ordered by the president of the judicial court with jurisdiction to hear the case on the merits. The president may authorise the bailiff to make any useful observations with a view to establishing the origin, consistency and extent of the infringement. In order to ensure the protection of business secrecy, the president may ex officio order…
Where the judge has made the seizure subject to the provision of guarantees by the claimant, these must be provided before the seizure is carried out. On pain of nullity and damages against the bailiff, the latter must, before proceeding with the seizure, give copies to the holders of the objects seized or described of the order and, where applicable, of the deed recording the provision of guarantees. A copy…
The period provided for in the last paragraph of Article L. 521-4 and given to the claimant to appeal on the merits is twenty working days or thirty-one calendar days, whichever is longer, from the day on which the seizure or description took place. .
The president of the judicial court may order, in the light of the seizure report, any measure to complete the proof of the alleged acts of infringement.
The seat and jurisdiction of the judicial courts with exclusive jurisdiction to hear design actions pursuant to Article L. 521-3-1 of the Intellectual Property Code are set in accordance with Table VI annexed to Article D. 211-6-1 of the Code of Judicial Organisation.
Actions and claims relating to Community designs provided for by Article L. 522-2 shall be brought before the judicial courts referred to in Article R. 211-7 of the Code of Judicial Organisation.
Chapter Va of Title III of Book III shall apply to the detention by the customs administration of goods likely to infringe designs, as provided for in Chapter Ia of Title II of Book V. .
The employee who is the author of an invention shall immediately make a declaration thereof to the employer. In the event of more than one inventor, a joint declaration may be made by all the inventors or by some of them only.
The declaration shall contain the information, in the employee’s possession, sufficient to enable the employer to assess the classification of the invention in one of the categories provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article L. 611-7. This information concerns: 1° The purpose of the invention and the applications envisaged; 2° The circumstances in which it was made, for example: instructions or directives received, experience or work of the…
Our French business lawyers are here to help.
We offer a FREE evaluation of your case.
Call us at +33 (0) 1 84 88 31 00 or send us an email.
is a Registered Trademark of
PETROFF LAW FIRM (SELARL LEGASTRAT)
182, rue de Rivoli
75001, Paris France
RCS Paris n°814433470
Paris Bar Registration n° (Toque) C2396
is a Registered Trademark of
PETROFF LAW FIRM (SELARL LEGASTRAT)
182, rue de Rivoli
75001, Paris France
RCS Paris n°814433470
Paris Bar Registration n° (Toque) C2396
Resources
is a Registered Trademark of
PETROFF LAW FIRM (SELARL LEGASTRAT)
182, rue de Rivoli
75001, Paris France
RCS Paris n°814433470
Paris Bar Registration n° (Toque) C2396
Useful links
Our French business lawyers are here to help.
We offer a FREE evaluation of your case.
Call +33 (0) 1 84 88 31 00 or send us an email.
All information exchanged through this website will be communicated to lawyers registered with a French Bar and will remain confidential.
